简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Alameda Research, a subsidiary of the defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX, has recently filed a lawsuit against KuCoin in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. This legal move aims to recover more than $50 million in assets that Alameda claims are part of the FTX estate.
Alameda Research, a subsidiary of the defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX, has recently filed a lawsuit against KuCoin in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. This legal move aims to recover more than $50 million in assets that Alameda claims are part of the FTX estate, designated for creditor repayments. The assets, originally valued at approximately $28 million at the time of FTX's collapse in November 2022, have since increased in worth due to market fluctuations.
According to court filings, KuCoin froze these assets shortly after FTX‘s downfall, and despite multiple requests from FTX’s legal team, the exchange has yet to return them. In its lawsuit, Alameda Research asserts that KuCoins refusal to release the assets constitutes a breach of bankruptcy laws. They argue that the exchange has unjustly retained the funds and are seeking their return, along with additional compensation for delays incurred. As of yet, KuCoin has not publicly responded to the lawsuit or provided any explanation regarding the retained assets.
This legal action against KuCoin comes on the heels of a recent settlement between FTX and another cryptocurrency exchange, Bybit. Through that settlement, FTX successfully retrieved $228 million in assets, further strengthening its repayment capacity. In a related development earlier in October, a U.S. judge approved FTX‘s liquidation and repayment strategy, which aims to settle 98% of outstanding creditor claims. Based on the value of FTX’s assets at the time of its collapse, this plan may allow creditors to recover up to 119% of their initial claims.
In addition to efforts to retrieve assets from various crypto exchanges, FTX‘s collapse has brought scrutiny upon its former auditor, Prager Metis. The accounting firm recently agreed to pay $745,000 in civil penalties to the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) as part of a settlement for alleged misconduct related to its audits of FTX. The SEC investigation cited negligence-based fraud in two FTX audit reports and identified significant compliance lapses with both auditing standards and the firm’s internal procedures. Furthermore, Prager Metis agreed to pay an additional $1.2 million following a separate SEC inquiry into its violations of independence rules, which involved over 200 companies from 2017 to 2020.
This series of legal proceedings underscores the complex financial and regulatory aftermath of FTXs collapse, as efforts to reclaim assets and address regulatory compliance continue across multiple entities. As FTX works to recover funds and fulfil creditor obligations, the unfolding legal cases also highlight broader concerns about accountability and transparency within the crypto industry.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Tether hits record $7.7 billion in 2024 profits, $102.5 billion in U.S. Treasury holdings, and grows USD₮ circulation to nearly $120 billion in Q3 report.
Coinbase launches a new Engineering Hub in Singapore, partnering with EDB to foster blockchain innovation and nurture local talent in the APAC region.
Robinhood, Kraken, and Galaxy Digital launch USDG stablecoin with Paxos, aiming to expand global stablecoin use for secure cross-border payments.
In a November 4 filing, legal representatives for Binance and its CEO Changpeng Zhao (CZ) contested the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) amended complaint, asserting that the SEC merely pays “lip service” to a court ruling that excludes crypto assets from the definition of securities. The lawyers argue that despite this ruling, the SEC has continued to disregard its implications on digital asset trading