简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Extrait:The scheme was a spectacular failure. But there are still good reasons why Tesla shouldn't be a public company.
It's been over a year since Elon Musk's now-infamous effort to take Tesla private.
The scheme was a spectacular failure.
But there are still good reasons why Tesla shouldn't be a public company.
Visit Business Insider's homepage for more stories.
A year ago, Elon Musk tweeted his now-infamous “funding secured” message, announcing a failed bid to take Tesla private at an inside-joke price of $420 per share.
What followed was jeers from critics, baffled enthusiasm from fans, and an investigation by the US Securities and Exchange Commission that cost Musk his chairmanship of the Tesla board and installed a protocol that would have him pre-approve tweets that might affect investors.
In retrospect, the entire episode was tinged with madness and could have been interpreted as Musk cracking, after years of jousting with Wall Street short sellers and a media that was equal parts booster-ish and hostile.
Somewhat lost in the chaos was a still-important question: “Would Tesla be better off as a private company?”
The answer is actually yes. Here are five reasons why:
Avertissement:
Les opinions exprimées dans cet article représentent le point de vue personnel de l'auteur et ne constituent pas des conseils d'investissement de la plateforme. La plateforme ne garantit pas l'exactitude, l'exhaustivité ou l'actualité des informations contenues dans cet article et n'est pas responsable de toute perte résultant de l'utilisation ou de la confiance dans les informations contenues dans cet article.
GO MARKETS
HFM
ATFX
STARTRADER
FBS
FXCM
GO MARKETS
HFM
ATFX
STARTRADER
FBS
FXCM
GO MARKETS
HFM
ATFX
STARTRADER
FBS
FXCM
GO MARKETS
HFM
ATFX
STARTRADER
FBS
FXCM