简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
요약:General Motors and Fiat-Chrysler have been buying Tesla regulatory credits, new Delaware state filings show.
New documents published by Bloomberg on Monday show that General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) have been among the purchasers of Tesla's zero-emissions regulatory credits.
Previously, the buyers of Tesla's emissions credits has been secret.
FCA says consumer demand for zero-emissions vehicles isn't keeping pace with regulatory requirements, hence the purchases.
GM, meanwhile, says the purchases are to help hedge against future regulatory changes.
Since 2012, Tesla has made more than $1.7 billion selling regulatory credits to other automakers.
The buyers of those credits, which purchase them to make up for shortfalls in their own zero-emissions vehicle sales, have previously been shrouded in secrecy. However, Bloomberg News reported Monday that both General Motors and Fiat Chrysler Automobiles (FCA) are two of the buyers, citing state filings in Delaware.
News of FCA's credit-buying in the United States follows news that the company would also pay hundreds of millions of euros in order to count Tesla's electric vehicles among its own fleet, and thus avoiding hefty fines from European Union regulators.
An FCA spokesperson told Bloomberg that government rules for emissions are being made stricter more quickly than consumer demand is turning in favor of electric vehicles.
GM spokesperson said its investment in the credits was a hedge against “future regulatory uncertainties.”
For context, GM sold 5,226 of the Chevrolet Bolt, it's best-selling electric vehicle, in the first four months of 2019. In the same time, Tesla sold 32,475 Model 3s, according to sales data from InsideEV's.
Now read:
The criticism around Tesla selling emission credits proves that analysts don't understand the company's business
면책 성명:
본 기사의 견해는 저자의 개인적 견해일 뿐이며 본 플랫폼은 투자 권고를 하지 않습니다. 본 플랫폼은 기사 내 정보의 정확성, 완전성, 적시성을 보장하지 않으며, 개인의 기사 내 정보에 의한 손실에 대해 책임을 지지 않습니다.