简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) issued a public warning against proprietary trading firms. There goes another hit for the proprietary trading firms!
The Financial Services and Markets Authority (FSMA) has issued a public advisory regarding the dangers associated with proprietary trading (prop trading) firms.
Prop trading firms, as elucidated by the FSMA, function by enabling consumers to trade various financial instruments such as shares, bonds, commodities, cryptocurrencies, Contracts for Difference (CFDs), and forex products without requiring the use of their own capital. However, the apparent risk-free nature of these opportunities often conceals an intricate network of financial pitfalls.
The regulator asserts that entities of this nature are currently under investigation for their questionable practices, which involve exploiting the financial inexperience of consumers and enticing them into high-risk investments.
The FSMA outlines that consumers interested in participating with prop trading firms are compelled to undergo costly and demanding courses. These courses, with a substantial price tag, aim to sift out less committed participants while generating revenue for the firms. Upon completion of these courses, consumers receive a 'certificate,' essentially a diploma issued by the firm, granting them participation in simulated trading activities. This simulated trading involves using demo accounts provided by prop trading firms, where consumers never execute real trades. Instead, the firm maintains full control over the simulated transactions, leaving consumers unaware of any potential commissions. It is also reported that many consumers find themselves caught in a cycle of paying for multiple courses without gaining access to actual trading opportunities.
The FSMA has observed a troubling surge in advertising for prop trading firms on social media platforms and the emergence of websites offering paid courses to assist consumers in navigating the challenges posed by these entities. These firms often promote trading in intricate financial instruments like CFDs and forex products, carrying significant risks for investors and potentially resulting in the complete loss of their investment.
In response to these developments, the FSMA has issued a firm caution to the public, advising against involvement with prop trading firms and their affiliated entities. The authority underscores the importance of consumers exercising utmost caution when dealing with such firms, emphasizing the inherent risks and potential financial losses involved.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Last Friday, oil prices closed slightly lower but increased for the fourth consecutive week, mainly due to the impact of the latest U.S. sanctions on Russian energy trade, which heightened concerns about oil supply disruptions.
Recently, gold prices have been driven by rising U.S. government debt, persistent inflation, and growing economic uncertainty, showing strong performance.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has imposed a hefty $106.41 million fine on Vanguard Group, Inc. following an investigation into misleading statements regarding the tax consequences of its Target Retirement Funds (TRFs).
A new study has revealed that nearly 90 percent of the Swiss population is against the abolition of cash, highlighting a significant rise in opposition compared to the previous year. The Precious Metals Study 2024, conducted by precious metals trader Philoro, shows a marked increase in the number of Swiss citizens who prefer to keep cash in circulation, with a notable shift in public opinion.