简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) today announced a EUR 290,000 settlement with Cyprus investment firm (CIF) Mount Nico Corp Ltd. The company operates through brands such as NicoFX and Excentral.
The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) today announced a EUR 290,000 settlement with Cyprus investment firm (CIF) Mount Nico Corp Ltd. The company operates through brands such as NicoFX and Excentral.
The CySEC explains that, according to article 37(4) of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission Law of 2009, it has the power to reach a settlement for any violation or possible violation, act or omission for which there is reasonable ground to believe that it took place in violation of the provisions of CySECs supervised legislation.
A settlement has been reached with the CIF Mount Nico Corp Ltd for possible violations of the Investment Services and Activities and Regulated Markets Law of 2017 and the Directive DI144-2014-14 of the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission for the Prudential Supervision of Investment Services Firms.
More specifically, the investigation for which the settlement was reached, is related to the findings concerning, the period of February 2020 to December 2020, with regard to the Companys compliance with:
1. Article 5(1) of the Law regarding the requirement for CIF authorization.
2. Article 22 (1) of the Law regarding the obligation of continuous compliance with the conditions of CIF authorisation and specifically with articles 17(3)(c) (specifying an identified target market) and 17(9) (safeguarding of clients rights of the Law).
3. Article 24 of the Law regarding conflicts of interest.
4. Paragraph 21(g) of the Directive DI144-2014-14 regarding the variable elements of remuneration.
5. Article 25, sections (1) and (3), of the Law regarding the general principles and information addressed to clients.
6. Article 26(3)(a) of the Law, Law regarding the assessment of suitability and appropriateness and reporting to clients.
The settlement reached with the investment firm, for possible violations, is for the amount of €290,000, which the company has already paid.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Find the best Forex brokers for 2025 with low spreads, zero commissions, and no hidden fees. Simplify your trading journey with insights and the WikiFX app!
FXOpen announced the trading competition called ForexCup Trading Championship 2025 for traders. You can join, trade, and compete for exciting prizes. Here are the details
The 2011 film Margin Call offers a gripping portrayal of the early hours of the 2008 financial crisis, set within a Wall Street investment firm. While the film is a fictionalised account, its lessons resonate strongly with traders and finance professionals. For one trader, watching the film had a lasting impact, shaping how they approached risk, decision-making, and the harsh realities of the financial world.
Over the past decade, one particular avenue has gained significant popularity: proprietary trading, or prop trading. As more traders seek to maximize their earning potential while managing risk, many are turning to proprietary firms for the resources, capital, and opportunities they offer. In this article, we’ll explore why an increasing number of traders are choosing proprietary trading firms as their preferred platform for success.